Kyoto non deve morire: primo podcast 2013 della SISSA

kyotoPer ascoltare il PODCAST clicca qui

LA VOCE DEL MASTER – Inizia Re post, il podcast del Master in Giornalismo Scientifico Digitale della Sissa di Trieste. Seguiteci ogni due settimane sulle pagine di Oggiscienza.

Che ne è stato del protocollo di Kyoto? La scadenza prevista per questo accordo era Dicembre 2012. Ma nel frattempo è stato prolungato senza variazioni fino al 2020 con l’accordo di Doha, per rispondere alle esigenze della crisi climatica. Ma cos’è successo esattamente a Doha? Lo abbiamo chiesto a Federico Antognazza, vice presidente di Italian Climate Network, che era presente all’ultima conferenza mondiale per il clima. Parliamo di Kyoto anche con Mauro Albrizio, responsabile europeo di Legambiente, che ci spiega l’iniziativa del Fondo Rotativo per Kyoto.

Con la rubrica Mr o Mrs Hyde conosceremo i lati nascosti di scienziati o scienziate che hanno una seconda vita oltre la ricerca. In questa puntata intervistiamo Giulio Peruzzi, professore di Fisica all’Università di Padova, che ha un’insolita passione per le arrampicate urbane.

La rubrica Orwell ci accompagnerà in un viaggio dal passato al futuro: quanto del nostro futuro c’era già nel passato? Il primo appuntamento è con Fahrenheit 451. Ne parliamo con Giampaolo Proni, ricercatore di Semiotica presso l’Università di Bologna e scrittore di fantascienza.

Spot the Book è il nostro consiglio di lettura per voi: ritorneremo sul tema dell’ambiente con Apocalypse Now di Luca Lombroso.

Infine la rubrica Il pangolino, che ci porta alla scoperta della natura e delle sue curiosità. In questa puntata parleremo degli animali che cambiano sesso.

Buon ascolto!

How many piano tuners are there in Chicago?

oxford 2011 - the first 014 It seems a simple question, but if you have no internet, it might become very hard to answer it.  This kind of question is known as Fermi Problem, because the famous physicist used to enjoy this kind of game. A Fermi Problem is a way to estimate a certain quantity, with a good approximation,  without using any type of databases.

You can see an example of Fermi Problem in the following reasoning, taken from Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_problem):

  1. There are approximately 5,000,000 people living in Chicago.
  2. On average, there are two persons in each household in Chicago.
  3. Roughly one household in twenty has a piano that is tuned regularly.
  4. Pianos that are tuned regularly are tuned on average about once per year.
  5. It takes a piano tuner about two hours to tune a piano, including travel time.
  6. Each piano tuner works eight hours in a day, five days in a week, and 50 weeks in a year.

From these assumptions, we can compute that the number of piano tunings in a single year in Chicago is (5,000,000 persons in Chicago) / (2 persons/household) × (1 piano/20 households) × (1 piano tuning per piano per year) = 125,000 piano tunings per year in Chicago.

We can similarly calculate that the average piano tuner performs (50 weeks/year)×(5 days/week)×(8 hours/day)/(2 hours to tune a piano) = 1000 piano tunings per year per piano tuner. And then, dividing gives (125,000 piano tunings per year in Chicago) / (1000 piano tunings per year per piano tuner) = 125 piano tuners in Chicago.

Apart from piano tuners, this kind of reasoning could help us to answer scientific questions too. For example, in 1945 Fermi was able to estimate  the strenght of the atomic bomb detonated at the trinity nuclear test in New Mexico, based on the distance made by pieces of paper dropped from his hand during the test.

But maybe you are asking yourself the reason why I am interested in this kind of estimations. Well, that is because my teacher has given me a special homework last week: I have to estimate in how many places are there in Trieste, people could drink a coffee. A very hard knot to untie….but now I have understood that it is a Fermi Problem…and I am ready to take up the challenge!

So, if I have been able to intrigue you….keep waiting for the next post!

“There are many girls, but only one Bell Laboratory!”

parigi 09  5eme 143

Says professor Capasso, one of the most famous Physicists at Harvard University, remembering a young Italian student who was undecided whether to remain in Italy to be close to his girlfriend or go to US for an excellent position.

Apart from gossip, today I have had a great lesson on what could be a significant aspect of the couple Slowness/dynamism, nowadays. Me and my colleagues of sissa’s master have had the possibility to pass one hour together with professor Capasso, talking with him about Physics and the possibilities for students to become researchers today.
He stressed that in this historical moment young people must be open, we must throw out the tiny idea that they have the right of studying in our native country: we must go, we must be dynamic. We must not be afraid of competitiveness, but pursue it, even if it leads us away from our safe harbor.
So, he suggests that maybe the whole category of brains drain must be reconsidered. Actually, I had never thought about this point before; we usually talk about many researchers that are obliged to leave, considering it as a failure of our society. Now – Capasso suggests – we must start considering it as a desirable character of the Research with Capital R, that consider leaving and movement in general as fundamental facets of our society, as Slowness is fundamental – as I have underlined in the last post – for being sustainable citizens.

To conclude, I don’t know which is the right choice, if the Bell Laboratories or the girlfriend; I only know that we must feel ourselves as complete as possible, and I thank to professor Capasso for this starting point for meditation.

Doha2012: an (environ)mental issue.

paris 09   8eme 028I start this part of my blog focusing on a theme that I feel so important: the awareness of climate risk.

Some days ago, I had the possibility to attend a conference at Sissa (trieste), illuminated by the energy of Luca Mercalli, one of the most active italians in the field of environmental risk communication.

 

He said that communicate sciences is like cooking,  in the sense that we must – first of all – put science communication into a wider perspective, considering the environmental problems only as the tip of the iceberg.

I agree with this idea: I think that the environmental problems we have now are the consequences of our narrow minded short-term, that considers  environmental issues only as  a column between other news.

In this sense, I link here some examples of how the most important  italian online newspapers have communicated today the beginning of the 18 ONU’s conference about Climate Changes in Doha (Qatar). To explore more the news, reflecting once again on what these environmental problems are essentially mindset issues.

ps: some national newspapers are not mentioned here. That because they have not talked about the news yet.

 And now, Mesdames et messieurs, the links:

http://www.corriere.it/ambiente/12_novembre_26/qatar-conferenza-onu-clima-doha_6f09a19e-37b8-11e2-94e7-603de4c26bba.shtml

http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2012/11/26/cop18-lobiettivo-di-andare-oltre-kyoto/427073/

http://www.lastampa.it/scienza/ambiente?refresh_ce

http://www.repubblica.it/ambiente/2012/11/26/news/conferenza_doha_clima-47473137/

http://www.unita.it/ambiente/clima-al-via-summit-di-doha-br-kyoto-2-e-intesa-globale-1.468663